2004 Napa Valley Vintage
Everything ran early, from bud break to flowering to harvest, and an incredibly warm, dry September shriveled berries into a small, concentrated crop.
Hugh Davies of Schramsberg Vineyards gave the Napa Valley Vintners the line that sums up 2004: spring was early, bud break was early, flowering was early, and now winter is early too. Warm, consistent summer weather sat between an early spring bud break and several late-summer hot spells. Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps Vineyards said September was incredibly warm and dry, causing shriveling or concentration in many vineyards. Harvest began about two weeks ahead of schedule, and Pierre Birebent of Signorello Vineyards put his three weeks ahead of the year before. The crop was small, reported by Wine Spectator at 20 to 50 percent below normal in Napa, and the wines were described at the time as intense, deep colored and very concentrated.
Growing season
Everything in 2004 happened ahead of the calendar. Hugh Davies of Schramsberg Vineyards gave the Napa Valley Vintners the cleanest summary of it: spring was early, bud break was early, flowering was early, and now winter is early too. The Napa Valley Vintners chart puts bud break markers for all four tracked varieties in March, the earliest of the years it charted in this run. The vintage carried the imprint of that early spring straight through. Rain front-loaded hard and then stopped: 4.23 inches in January and 11.11 in February on the chart, then 1.25 in March and 0.52 in April, with nothing recorded from May through September. Summer itself was warm and consistent, bracketed by the early bud break at one end and several late-summer hot spells at the other. September did the real work on the fruit. Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps Vineyards said September was incredibly warm and dry, which caused shriveling or concentration in many vineyards depending on how you wanted to describe it. Harvest came in fast and ahead of schedule. Dave Whitmer, the Napa County Agricultural Commissioner, said picking began about two weeks ahead of schedule and progressed fairly normally until the warm weather trend raised the sugar levels in the fruit and the pace of harvest along with it. Pierre Birebent of Signorello Vineyards measured it against the year before and said 2004 ran three weeks earlier. The chart's harvest bands start earlier and run shorter across all four varieties than in 2001 through 2003.
- Bud break, flowering and harvest all ran early, per Hugh Davies of Schramsberg Vineyards
- Rain front-loaded into January and February, with 1.25 inches in March, 0.52 in April and nothing recorded May through September
- Warm, consistent summer weather was punctuated by several late-summer hot spells
- September was incredibly warm and dry and caused berry shrivel in many vineyards, per Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps
- Harvest began roughly two weeks ahead of schedule and then accelerated as sugars rose
- Pierre Birebent of Signorello Vineyards reported picking three weeks earlier than the previous year
- Hugh Davies of Schramsberg Vineyards summarized the year as an early spring, early bud break, early flowering and an early winter
- Warm, consistent summer weather was bracketed by an early spring bud break and several late-summer hot spells, per the Napa Valley Vintners
- Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps Vineyards said September was incredibly warm and dry, causing shriveling or concentration in many vineyards
- Napa County Agricultural Commissioner Dave Whitmer reported harvest beginning about two weeks ahead of schedule before the warm trend raised sugar levels and the pace of picking
- Pierre Birebent of Signorello Vineyards said the 2004 harvest ran three weeks earlier than the year before
- Wine Spectator reported Napa crop size at 20 to 50 percent below normal, with Joseph Phelps holding to about two tons per acre for most varieties
- Wine Spectator graded the Napa and Sonoma 2004 vintage A minus, and Craig Williams rated the reds a notch better than 2003
A small, concentrated crop
The September heat cost volume and bought concentration. Wine Spectator reported Napa crop size at 20 to 50 percent below normal according to many reports, and cited Joseph Phelps Vineyards holding to about two tons per acre for most varieties as a result of the September shrivel. Dave Whitmer said some varieties showed a lower yield than expected. Pierre Birebent was blunt about the trade: the crop is small, small but extremely high on the quality side. Joel Aiken of Beaulieu Vineyard tied the two together directly, saying 2004 brought grape clusters with small berries and ripe flavors that resulted in wines with concentration and power.
- Wine Spectator put Napa crop size at 20 to 50 percent below normal
- Joseph Phelps Vineyards held to roughly two tons per acre for most varieties after September shrivel
- Napa County Agricultural Commissioner Dave Whitmer noted some varieties yielded lower than expected
- Small berries and ripe flavors produced concentration and power in the reds, per Joel Aiken of Beaulieu Vineyard
The glasses, tools, and cards I stand behind.
A short list. Nothing I would not recommend to a friend.
Browse the WineShopOpen one bottle, taste it for weeks.
A Coravin lets you pour a glass without pulling the cork, which is how I taste a producer across vintages without opening the whole rack. The Pivot+ is the one I recommend first. $199.
See it in the WineShopWhat winemakers said at harvest
These are assessments made at harvest in autumn 2004, not later verdicts on how the wines aged. Laurie Hook of Beringer said quality seemed very high across the board, with great color and tannin extraction in the reds. Tim Bell of Freemark Abbey reached for a recent comparison: it reminds me of our 1999s, wines with beautiful fruit and long-term aging potential. Wine Spectator graded the Napa and Sonoma 2004 vintage A minus, reported that Napa vintners found the young reds intense, deep colored and very concentrated, and quoted Craig Williams rating the vintage favorably against 2002 and a notch better than 2003.
- Laurie Hook of Beringer reported very high quality across the board with great color and tannin extraction
- Tim Bell of Freemark Abbey compared the wines to the 1999s for fruit and long-term aging potential
- Wine Spectator graded Napa and Sonoma 2004 at A minus
- Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps rated the reds favorably against 2002 and a notch better than 2003
- 2004 in Napa ran early at every stage: early spring, early bud break, early flowering, early harvest, summarized by Hugh Davies of Schramsberg Vineyards.
- September was incredibly warm and dry and caused berry shrivel or concentration across many vineyards, per Craig Williams of Joseph Phelps Vineyards.
- Harvest started about two weeks ahead of schedule per Napa County Agricultural Commissioner Dave Whitmer, and three weeks ahead of 2003 at Signorello Vineyards.
- Crop size in Napa ran 20 to 50 percent below normal according to Wine Spectator, with Joseph Phelps down to about two tons per acre for most varieties.
- Wine Spectator graded Napa and Sonoma 2004 at A minus; Craig Williams rated the reds a notch better than 2003 and comparable to 2002.
Take your wine study further
Flashcards, blind tastings, and a tasting journal in the Wine with Seth app.
Try the app free